Can An English Shepherd Be Registered With Akc

Frequently Asked Questions

Are English Shepherds really a "breed"?
Why aren't English Shepherds registered with the AKC?
How are English Shepherds different from Border Collies? or Australian Shepherds?
Why are there so many different registries for English Shepherds? Which one should I use?
What health issues are mutual in English language Shepherds?
What questions should I inquire when interviewing a breeder?
Are English language Shepherds practiced with children?

Are English Shepherds actually a "brood"?

To address this question, it is first necessary to respond the question "what is a breed?" Perhaps surprisingly, this question does not have a simple black & white answer. While there is a trend (promoted by certain medical labs!) toward DNA testing dogs to decide "breed", in fact these tests do not -- tin not -- identify Breed. This is because "breed" is not a categorization based in science -- breeds are defined past social convention.

The following extract from the University of Oklahoma's website provides a articulate explanation of this point:

"...this definition from The Genetics of Populations by Jay L. Lush helps explicate why a skillful definition of "breed" is elusive.

"A breed is a group of domestic animals, termed such by common consent of the breeders, ... a term which arose among breeders of livestock, created one might say, for their own utilise, and no one is warranted in assigning to this word a scientific definition and in calling the breeders wrong when they deviate from the formulated definition. Information technology is their discussion and the breeders common usage is what we must have as the correct definition."

Equally you can encounter from Dr. Lush's definition it is at to the lowest degree in part the perception of the breeders and the livestock industry which decides when a grouping of individuals constitutes a "breed".

This may seem like a slippery answer just information technology is disquisitional to empathize this indicate. Breeds exist when a grouping of breeders say they practice. How breeders identify members of a brood will vary depending on their particular values & purposes; there is no single test that applies for all breeds. The DNA tests currently marketed can tell you lot who a dog'due south parents are; for the past 100 years, some canis familiaris brood registries (such as the AKC) accept actively promoted the thought that breeds are defined SOLELY past parentage (full-blooded). For these registries, parentage equals breed. This is NOT how well-nigh canis familiaris breeds originated or were maintained for hundreds of years, nonetheless, and the process of defining breeds past full-blooded ("purebreeding") has proven disastrous for the health and integrity of many types of dogs.

Prior to the advent of "purebreeding" in the belatedly 19th century, canis familiaris breeds were identified based on the dogs' location and use: "English Shepherd" dogs were dogs in or from the U.K. that worked equally shepherds, managing livestock. Pretty elementary! These dogs were selected for qualities that suited them to this environment and work; consequently, they typically were of a particular size and character. Because the qualities of size and grapheme are heritable, practical people would choose a puppy out of parents that had proven their success as working shepherd dogs. And then the brood was established. A group of dogs was identified that was characterized past their appearance, ancestry, and abilities. Members of the brood passed these qualities on to their offspring.

This applied definition of "brood" -- that is, a group of dogs characterized by their appearance, ancestry, and abilities, and that reliably pass these qualities on to their offspring -- describes the approach to breed identification traditionally used by English Shepherd breeders. Using this arroyo has produced dogs that have maintained consistent blazon (appearance), character and working abilities for over 150 years. Very few AKC "purebreed" populations can say the same!

Then... yep, English Shepherds are a unique and valuable "brood"!

Why aren't English language Shepherds registered with the AKC?

The AKC was founded in the late 19th century to "promote the sport of purebred dogs". The chief focus of the social club was the arrangement and promotion of shows in which dogs were evaluated based on their appearance. English Shepherds have never been valued primarily for their appearance; historically, the brood has been valued and promoted for their usefulness equally farm dogs. English Shepherd breeders generally did not have resources for or interest in participating in dog shows, and English Shepherd buyers were mostly not impressed by "fancy papers" -- so, English Shepherds remained independent of the organized dog fancy in the U.S.

For more information, read on...
To skip to next question, click here.

It is at present clear that English language Shepherds accept benefited greatly by non adopting the culture and practices that adhere to the Dog Fancy in the Usa. To understand why this is the case requires some understanding of the history of the AKC and purebred domestic dog registries. Some of the key points are encapsulated in the following excerpts from Ann Hier's "Dog Shows And then and Now":

Pitfalls in the History of the AKC

(1) Motives of AKC founders: "... those in control of the canine political process in America (AKC) had personal vested interests to protect and promote, many making their livings, in whole or in part, from dealing in dogs... blatant partisanship became ingrained in the organisation".

Comment: I really can non over-emphasize the cultural and practical differences between dog owners who wait at dogs as potential employees, to be hired for a job (farm work), and those who "deal in dogs" every bit commodities for sale. English Shepherd owners have traditionally been in the former group; the founders of the AKC were decidedly in the latter.

(2) Benched shows as a forum for politics and self-promotion: "...the Westminster Kennel Gild (predecessor to AKC)... is probably the most responsible for the creation of the not bad chasm which exists today between the field trial and conformation factions... from the first WKC benched show in 1877, information technology became very articulate that conformation judging was based, quite largely, on personal opinion. Field trials, on the other hand, required performance which couldn't exist manipulated as hands by merely installing the "correct" judges. Thus, when a large circuit of field trials was officially established in 1884, this gave further impetus to the nascency of the American Kennel Order, formed with the specific requirement for membership being the holding and promotion of benched shows".

(3) Fads in judging: "Probably nil is then harmful to any breed or diverseness of animals as the fads which periodically gear up in for their supposed improvement. At one time glaze was the nifty fad and i constantly saw skilful (dogs) put dorsum in the prize list because their coats were considered likewise straight and shine (!)... this went on for a considerable time until a brood was established of fluffy, soft-looking dogs with great open up feet and spongy thick legs, long bodies and heavy ears -- the very opposite of a what a real hard (canis familiaris) should be. The side by side fad was "front, legs and feet". Everything else was ignored for the time being... I don't know how these fads are started, but certainly they are the very worst things which maybe could befall a breed." (from Pull a fast one on Terrier Chronicle, 1892).

(4) Loss of health and variety: "... the uniquely extraordinary genetic quality of the canine -- diverseness -- may contribute to its pass up. This available diverseness tends to foster canis familiaris fanciers only interested in their favorite breed with fiddling reality based concern that the health and viability of all breeds has a directly impact on (their own)... fifty-fifty a concerned fancy, saddled with a registry body which defines canine progress equally continual growth in registrations (revenue), will be doomed to failure unless urgent and relevant steps, beyond public relations window dressing, are taken...".

The health problems of modern "pedigree" dogs accept received a expert deal of attention in the press recently. These concerns are not new, even so, as evidenced by this article from Field and Fancy , published in 1901:

The Life Span of Prove Dogs

"A bailiwick that volition bear consideration, and really requires serious thought, is the e'er growing shortness of life axiomatic in some breeds of our domestic or show dogs. The dog is supposed to be an animal that might exist unhurt and hearty at 12 twelvemonth of age, and would live to 15 or xvi years or over, only we hear of breeds, popular on the show bench, averaging about half-dozen years, and a domestic dog of that historic period may look very sometime. In other cases we hear of sure families of dogs that that do not live beyond the historic period of iii or four years, three being nearer the limit than four; and in some cases two years might really strike the average. If dogs were bred from, whose age limit is nearly iii years and at the virtually six years, it, of course, necessarily follows that the progeny inherit the weakness of the parents and mature quickly, are in their prime, we might say, for a twelvemonth or two years, and at four years of age are beneath the ground.

... it is a fact that the carnivores, amidst which the dog is included, are a hard working race, living agile hunting lives and taking a lot of exercise. The question of early mortality and decadence among the dog tribe is occasioning considerable anxiety in the minds of some breeders; but as many of our fanciers come and go, staying in the fancy a short time and and so giving identify to others, the subject area has not been given the prominence it deserves.

Should many of our well-nigh prominent races acquire the character of being very brusque lived, their financial value will depreciate appropriately, and such breeds equally acquire the worst reputations in this line volition endure the most. The time has come to phone call a halt to breeding puppies from a short lived strain."

Sadly, these warnings about the need to prioritize health were non heeded, and the wellness and longevity of many AKC breeds has declined over the past 100 years. And, the beautiful Rough Collie sketched below bears petty resemblance to the dogs winning in the show ring today - after 100 years of "improvement". The AKC has supported some important initiatives to improve canine health via their Canine Health Foundation but unfortunately practices that perpetuate the problems -- airtight stud books and conformation competition -- take not significantly changed.

Origin of a Second American Multibreed Canis familiaris Registry - The UKC

English Shepherds accept been registered by another multi-breed registry -- the United Kennel Order -- since the 1920s. Ann Hier as well provides some interesting history on the relationship betwixt UKC and AKC in her volume, from which the following is excerpted:

"Chauncey Zachariah Bennett founded the United Kennel Club in 1898 equally an alternative registry to what he believed was the AKC'south emphasis on conformation-only show dogs owned by wealthy hobbyists. From the beginning, his goal was to provide a reliable registration service for the boilerplate man interested in preserving original working qualities, as well as conformation, of particular breeds. Bennet had been a clerk, then traveling salesman for the Desenberg grocery house. He subsequently formed the Bennett Novelty Works, manufacturing peanut-roasting machines. Patently, this was non the glamorous Golden Age background of those in charge of the AKC. Initially, Bennett had piffling support and, certainly, no backers for his dog registry service. For two decades he pursued the UKC as a passionate hobby from his home in Kalamazoo, Michigan. A skilled mathematician, Bennett was the start to base a registry filing system on a numerical footing rather than past proper name of either the dog or its possessor. Clearly a more logical method in anticipation of growth, the original system made UKC'south eventual transition to computers relatively painless.

Although AKC had already been in existence 14 years prior to UKC'due south birth, registration of dogs was notwithstanding a novel thought. The prinicipal divergence in initial concept betwixt the ii organizations was that AKC was first a show-giving organization, in which dogs must be either registered or listed in order to compete, whereas UKC'south primary concept was providing reliable pedigrees and record keeping services to breeders, with performance events and shows as adjunct activities. Because many of the UKC'south potential customers had no interest in showing their dogs as long as they could do the work for which they were bred, Bennett became a tireless promoter of the value of registered stock. As UKC gained acceptance and started to make boring only steady growth, the company made visible inroads into what AKC felt were registrations which should rightfully exist theirs -- fifty-fifty though most of these registrations were breeds the AKC didn't recognize. Nevertheless, by the mid-1920s, UKC had significantly expanded its events and AKC threatened fanciers with expulsion or being barred from AKC services if they exhibited their dogs at UKC shows. Bennett responded by encouraging exhibitors to show at both AKC and UKC events, stating that boycotting shows was of no particular benefit to the dog earth. However, when AKC officials started referring to UKC as an "outlaw organization," matters finally ended up in courtroom. The effect was legal recognition that AKC was non the only dog registry in the United States. For many years following, the AKC refused to recognize the legitimacy of UKC pedigrees for those dogs which their owners wished to cross-annals. This, despite the fact that UKC had always honored AKC pedigrees for anyone wishing to utilise their services.

From the beginning, UKC provided registry services for many rare breeds, or breeds non AKC recognized... In 1905, their company magazine, "Bloodlines" was introduced and is nevertheless in publication along with two other periodicals, "Coonhound Bloodlines" and "Hunting Retriever". When Bennett died in 1937, UKC registered 30,000 dogs compared to 84,000 for AKC. UKC is now the second oldest and second largest canine registry in the Us. However, because the AKC version of the dog show has developed into a more competitive forum where, in many breeds, a professional person handler is most a necessity, UKC conformation shows, which do not permit baiting or grooming in the ring, accept never really attracted the entries or attention of the AKC shows."

For anyone even so interested in reading virtually the UKC and its relationship with the English language Shepherd Gild, click here.

How are English Shepherds different from Border Collies or Australian Shepherds?

English Shepherds tin can be distinguished from related breeds such as Edge Collies and Australian Shepherds past because differences in the breeds' recent history, utilize, and advent (type). All iii derive from the shepherd's dogs of the British Isles. From this group, Border Collies as a breed started to diverge roughly 150 years agone, with the advent of sheep dog trials and the subsequent widespread option for a type of herding canis familiaris characterized by "strong eye". The quality of "eye" is not unique to Border Collies, but it is stronger and more consistent in that breed than in English Shepherds or Australian Shepherds. Both Australian Shepherds and English Shepherds piece of work in a what is often called a "loose-eyed" way, to dissimilarity it to the potent center of Border Collies. Click here to read about the types of "center".

For an overview of the relationships between the various breeds, see Linda Rorem'south diagram of the Collie family tree.

For more a more detailed explanation of brood differences, read on...
To skip to next question, click here .

History of Edge Collies

-excerpts from The Border Collie Museum (great website!):

"Sheila Grew, in her small but significant work, Key Dogs from the Border Collie Family (1984 Payne Essex Ltd.), describes the Border Collie as a "type of herding canis familiaris adult by shepherds and sheep farmers during the last hundred years", that is, since the latter part of the 19th century. She goes on to say information technology is:

"...characterized by its power to move large or pocket-size numbers of sheep in a silent controlled manner in complete co-operation with its master...[and] a most useful asset possessed by many of these border working collies was the power of the 'centre', the power to control the sheep past staring at them in a fixed and steady manner. Dogs with the right amount of 'eye' can keep their sheep bunched together well when driving them and thus avert a nifty deal of flanking, running from 1 side to the other. This in turn keeps the sheep calmer and so they are less drawn." . . .

"It was generally known every bit the 'Working Collie' to distinguish it from the developing show (Lassie) type collie which started to flourish frim 1860 when the starting time dog show to include subcontract collies took identify in Newcastle." . . .

"The Working Collie was bred for one purpose but in those days--for work..."

Left, Old Hemp, the progenitor of the Border Collie breed.

"The history of the Border Collie as a brood is inexorably married to the first sheepdog trial at Bala in 1873, to the nativity of Adam Telfer'due south Quondam Hemp (considered the progenitor of the Border Collie breed) in 1894, to the germination of the International Sheepdog Society in 1906, and to the coining of the name "Border Collie", attributed to the starting time secretary of the ISDS, James A. Reid, in 1921. Prior to that, at that place were just collies or sheepdogs or shepherds' dogs, and shepherds picked the type or working style that were most useful to their needs."
~ Carole Presberg, Border Collie Museum

While useful and stylish, strong eye is not e'er an effective tool for managing livestock. In some circumstances, the strong-eyed collie types were found to lack "ability" to move stubborn or aggressive animals; and, some dog owners prefer to work with dogs that have a steadier, sturdier temperament than some of the very dandy and sensitive trial dogs. Finally, biting (gripping or heeling) livestock was selected against in trial-blazon Edge Collies; biting in a trial may earn a disqualification. A great many farmers and ranchers needed a dog that was willing and able to utilize teeth when necessary -- every bit can exist seen in the many advertisements for English Shepherds and Australian Shepherds highlighting this attribute ("heeldrivers").

Comparison of Australian Shepherds and English language Shepherds

-- from a discussion on the ESC list:

"Taking the three-function approach to breed identification described past J. Bragg, hither are a few comparisons:

(i) History/ Ancestry --

Both breeds have ancestral roots in the shepherd's dogs from the Uk, imported to U.s. and selected by American farmers/ranchers equally all purpose stock dogs. Both breeds are "American" breeds despite being labeled English & Australian. ES have a longer history of registration -- going dorsum to 1920s. Aussies were showtime registered in the mid/tardily 1960s, I believe.

Geographically, ES had a relatively stronger presence in the eastern one-half of the state (southward & north) & midwest (and of course downward into Texas); Aussies accept had a stronger presence in the west (especially California & Nevada), though the range of the two breeds overlaps.

Aussies accept a much larger population (now) and a larger, more active, independent breed club (ASCA), with an emphasis on functioning & conformation events -- but also supporting registry and health research.

Aussies are recognized by AKC, ES are not. The pressures created by AKC recognition and the associated culture have been discussed extensively here and elsewhere; in short, English Shepherds are fortunate to have avoided the pitfalls of the AKC.

You lot might say that Aussies every bit a breed have a stronger "mainstream" presence in the dog world... for amend and for worse. To the extent that popularity tends to push all breeds into similar roles, and obscure the differences that originally defined them -- all are bred to be "proficient pets" -- AKC Aussies have a challenge maintaining their core identity as working farm dogs . The evolution of distinct "working" and "pet" (or "show") lines in that breed is i consequence.

(two) Type --

ES take had a breed standard for longer than Aussies (ASCA did non approve a standard until 1977 -- the first ES standards were written many decades prior to this).

The ES standards disqualify merle, and red (liver) is not peculiarly common; Aussies accept long been identified with the merle design ("blue dogs") and ruby is common -- simply sable (adequate in ES) is a disqualification. Correct in that location -- in the color line -- you have a distinction that created an artificial partitioning in the ancestral group of dogs... merle was a common pattern in the shepherds dogs of the U.k., but for whatever reasons, the ES registries opted to exclude it when establishing their standards. Every bit I read Aussie history, a desire to recognize and promote the "blue dogs" was a driving cistron in organizing the breed... the dogs weren't Simply blue (breeding merle-merle is not appropriate) just the blueish dogs were a hallmark of the breed. You lot take to wonder whether Aussies would ever take been established as a singled-out breed if the original ES standards had immune merle.

Aussies are docked or natural bobs; ES allow any tail length.

(iii) Purpose --

Both breed standards describe all purpose working subcontract dogs. The ASCA standard describes the dogs as follows: "The Australian Shepherd is intelligent, primarily a working canis familiaris of stiff herding and guardian instincts. He is an exceptional companion..." The ESCR standard reads: "English shepherds take been bred for generations as all-purpose, working farm dogs. Their responsibilities have ranged from herding and protecting stock, to dispatching vermin, guarding the home, and watching over children."

Both herd in upright, loose-eyed fashion -- in contrast to the strong-eyed manner characteristic of Border Collies (and now Kelpies).

Aussie history places relatively stronger accent on working big flocks/herds in the western US simply Aussies as well have a potent presence on pocket-size farms in other parts of the country. Aussies were also valued for their ability to piece of work in close, in tight spaces, every bit are ES. The ASCA stockdog trials emphasize this latter power with their arena format.

English language Shepherds were promoted for many years equally "America'southward premier cattle dog", natural low heelers that would get together or drive as required, able to adapt themselves to working a variety of dissimilar types of livestock.

In both cases (Aussies & ES), the distinguishing characteristic in their working style was non how they compare to ane some other (Aussie vs ES) but how they compare to the strong-eyed Edge Collie blazon. Aussies were lauded for their ability to piece of work in close, with heavy/stubborn stock, and their willingness to bite when needed -- as were English Shepherds."

~ posted by Mary Peaslee

Finally, having reviewed some of the distinctions between English language Shepherds, Australian Shepherds, and Border Collies, I would similar to add one final thought -- in the words of my friend Kay Spencer, let's not forget that they are all (but) collies!

Why are there so many registries for English language Shepherds? Which one should I use?

English Shepherds are currently registerable with iv key registries -- the United Kennel Club (UKC), the International English Shepherd Registry (IESR), the English language Shepherd Society Registry (ESCR),and the Animal Research Foundation (ARF). The alphabet soup of registry acronyms can be a little daunting but information technology is a fact of life in this breed! The registries operate independently but their histories are intertwined; they do non represent four separate breed populations, but rather overlapping and interwoven threads in the history of English language Shepherds.

The UKC started registering English Shepherds in the 1920s (encounter history to a higher place), and has registered a subset of the breed population continuously since that time. The UKC was not the first registry to recognize English Shepherds -- some breeders had registered their dogs with the at present defunct "Southeastern Kennel Lodge", only later shifted over to the UKC. In 2003, there was some controversy within the breed customs over the UKC's shift to include English Shepherds in the conformation ring. Some owners and breeders felt strongly that conformation showing was inherently detrimental to brood health and saw the shift in UKC policy and practices -- undertaken when UKC changed owners -- every bit a sign that the organisation had lost sight of its original purpose. Very few English language Shepherds have been shown in conformation, nevertheless, despite the shift in UKC policy, and the controversy has subsided in recent years. (Note: advertizing to the right was published the UKC magazine "Bloodlines", March 1952)

The 2nd registry to get available was Tom Stodghill'southward ARF in 1950, which was used to develop a studbook supporting the showtime English Shepherd breed social club ("English Shepherd Lodge of America" or ESCOA -- some other acronym!). ARF included dogs that were registered with UKC as well as dogs that had not been registered previously. Tom Stoghill was a tireless promoter of the breed, with potent opinions. One of those opinions -- that black and tan English language Shepherds were the most desirable members of the brood -- did non sit down well with another breeders. Eventually, disagreements over utilize of club funds combined with differences of opinion regarding colour to create a split up that resulted in the founding of a second brood club, The English Shepherd Society (ESC), in 1954. ESCOA eventually folded, but the registry Tom Stodghill founded continues to operate today.

One of the founders of the English Shepherd Club, Ed Emanuel, also launched a breed registry, the International English language Shepherd Registry, headquartered in Butler, Indiana. Although Mr Emanuel was active in the English language Shepherd Society, the registry operated independently of the club. Eventually the registry grew to include other breeds, and operates today as the National Stock Canis familiaris Registry. Ane of the more notable events in IESR history was the decision to allow "footstep in" registration for dogs that lacked a prior history of registration. The registrar would review photos and information on the dog, and if information technology was deemed consistent with the breed, the domestic dog could be registered as a "pace in" canis familiaris. After three generations, dogs from that original stride in dog would be fully registered. The rationale provided for this policy was "to brainstorm the pedigrees of hereafter generations of useful working dogs." (National Stock Dog mag, vol 46/ number 1). While this decision provoked some controversy, and accusations of registrations being issued to "mutts", information technology tin can besides be viewed as a refreshing acknowledgement of the reality that breeds did non step off the ark with Noah! The fact that closed studbooks are now widely recognized to have contributed to the health problems in purebred dogs is validation that a "stride in" policy, properly administered, can be a source of ongoing vitality.

One side notation to the history of English Shepherd registrations is the outcome of how dogs are named. Combing through English language Shepherd pedigrees tin can be an exercise in confusion because information technology chop-chop becomes apparent that names are changeable things... turns out, it was the policy at IESR to register a dog using the convention of "owner's proper noun" + "dog'south call name" -- and so, Joe Smith'due south domestic dog Rover would exist registered as "Smith's Rover". Since a great many English language Shepherds carried the names "Duke" and "Shep", the potential for back-up in registered names is obvious. Complicating things even more is the fact that registered names CHANGED if the domestic dog changed owners. This means that when Joe Smith's Rover is sold to John Martin, Rover's registered name became "Martin'south Rover". When scanning English Shepherd pedigrees, you volition accept the interesting experience of finding the same dog listed nether dissimilar names -- for example, in my own dog's pedigree, "Snyder's Carolina Jazz" and "Karr's Carolina Jazz" are both nowadays (same domestic dog) -- AND you may find the same name used for different dogs (there is an ongoing controversy over whether this accounts for the dissimilar pedigrees available for "Isle of mann's Texas Ranger"). All in all, it makes pedigree research a little trip down the rabbit hole!

The most recently launched registry, the English language Shepherd Society Registry, was founded in part to address a weakness in the operation of the other English Shepherd registries -- specifically, the lack of a publicly available studbook. The fragmentation of breed records -- divided among the three older registries -- and the lack of a published studbook created a situation in which it was impossible for breeders to identify potential convenance stock or research trends in the breed. Simple questions, like how many litters are being registered, or how many stud dogs are available, could non be answered. (Not to mention more complicated questions like, how many Isle of man's Texas Rangers are there?!). The English Shepherd Club database and registry was launched in 2004. ( Annotation: the lovely sable domestic dog pictured to the right is Brink's Molly Jo, the beginning dog registered by ESCR). There continues to be a trouble with inquiry and reporting on the breed population, unfortunately -- perhaps not surprisingly, the interest of a breed club in registration did non practise away with breed politics! -- so work remains to be washed.

1 final note: registration is sometimes viewed equally a ticket to events or services (your dog may have to be registered to participate in shows or trials), or equally a postage of quality ("purebred, pedigreed" stock). In truth, those are non the Primary value of registration. Registration provides a way for breeders with a common goal -- breeding dogs of a particular type and character -- to work together. Sharing data on pedigrees and heritable traits (similar health, temperament, working style) allows breeders to act as stewards of the "genepool" we inherited from previous generations of breeders. PLEASE register your canis familiaris somewhere and share data on your dogs with others!! By doing so, you help fill in the picture of what is going on in the breed, today. And, you volition help ensure that your dog's lineage does not become lost over time. Registration is NOT merely for dogs that will be bred, or shown; it is for ALL members of the breed!

What health problems are common in English Shepherds?

This is a difficult question to respond because there is very little data on the breed population. Most of what you lot read about English Shepherds is based on anecdote, individual experience, and -- sometimes -- wishful thinking. In that vein, my personal experience has been that it is non uncommon for dogs to live 14 years or more with relatively few vet expenses other than routine exams and immunizations.

That said, there are a few conditions -- common to many breeds -- which deserve attention. Hip dysplasia occurs in English Shepherds. Breeders can address this problem past screening their dogs with hip x-rays. Because hip dysplasia is genetically complex, it is not possible to eliminate all chance simply by breeding choices. It is important for breeders to brand informed choices, withal, and to take susceptibility to hip dysplasia into account when selecting convenance pairs. Ten-rays are necessary to do this; you frequently tin can non identify hip dysplasia only by watching a dog move.

Not-breeders should also have their domestic dog'south hips x-rayed to help place inheritance patterns in the breed and to guide management of their dog. Keeping your dog lean and fit throughout life can greatly reduce the signs and symptoms associated with hip dysplasia. Attention to the surfaces your canis familiaris lives and exercises on can assist limit the development of arthritis as well; slick surfaces, such as slippery concrete or laminate floors, tin can stress joints and effect in damage to joints.

English Shepherds are too known to carry a genetic mutation that results in sensitivity to some medications. The mutation is called "MDR-i mutation". Dogs can be tested for this mutation (DNA test) and dogs with either one or ii copies of the mutant gene should avoid taking certain medications. Check with your vet for more information.

Finally, there are certain genetic center diseases that are mutual in herding breeds. The genetic mutations responsible for Collie Eye Bibelot (CEA) and Progressive Retinal Atrophy-rod cone degeneration (PRA-prcd) are known to occur in English Shepherds so breeders are wise to screen their convenance dogs.

These (MDR-1, CEA, and PRA-prcd) are undoubtedly non the only illness-causing genes to occur in English Shepherds but they are ones that accept been identified and for which a exam is available. In general, breeders can minimize the expression of genetic affliction past cultivating a breed population that is sufficiently large and diverse to allow breeders to select for wellness and performance without resorting to shut inbreeding. The level of inbreeding (referred to as the coefficient of inbreeding, "COI") in any particular litter can provide an alphabetize for assessing the relative gamble of genetic illness.

What questions should I ask when interviewing a breeder?

The following questions are offered NOT as a means of interrogating breeders, but to highlight some bug to keep in mind as you search for a puppy. With many breeders, buying a pup ways joining their extended family, so take the time to get to know breeders and to find someone you would enjoy calculation as a friend! As well, there is not i "correct" answer to most questions. Wait for people who share your values and who put the well-being of their dogs and the breed outset. Finally, exist prepared to reply some questions yourself!

About their breeding program:

What is your history with the brood?

What are your goals as a breeder?

How do you determine whether or non to breed a dog?

How many litters practise you produce each twelvemonth?

How do you follow up on your puppies (buyers)?

About their electric current litter:

Tell me near the parents of the litter -- their age, health tests, temperament, accomplishments.

What made you make up one's mind to brood these two dogs?

What exercise you expect (or hope) to get from this breeding?

About their puppies:

When are (were) puppies born, and when will they be set up for new homes?

How are the puppies beingness raised?

How do y'all make up one's mind placements?

What sort of contract or terms practice yous apply to sales?

Are English Shepherds skillful with children?

English shepherds are by and large wonderful with children. However, every bit with all breeds, private dogs accept distinct personalities, and some will be more suited to a family with children than others. If y'all are thinking well-nigh a puppy and y'all accept small children, wait for a calm, outgoing, resilient puppy -- by which I mean a puppy with the power to forgive, and bounciness back, after stressful experiences. An experienced breeder should be able to direct y'all to those pups; take their advice . Do not choose a puppy based on looks! The infatuation you feel for that cute piffling pup will quickly fade if the puppy is not correct for your family.

As well, do not wait a puppy to join your family with the manners and temperament of a mature adult English shepherd. A well-bred English language shepherd will be a wonderful family unit companion if yous are willing to invest the time and free energy required to socialize and railroad train him. Be very honest with yourself virtually this... adding a puppy isn't quite as much work as another child, merely only because they grow up much faster!

I recommend Brian Kilcommons' brusque volume, "Kid-Proofing Your Dog", as a resource for new owners.